|
|
Post by YellowLemondTed on Nov 22, 2010 7:41:10 GMT -5
Do you think that now that Jimmy Johnson has won 5 nascar titles, he will be scrutinized and tested and re-tested for illegal blood doping like they've done with Lance Armstrong since he won his 5th, 6th, and 7th?
|
|
|
|
Post by 1yellowtire on Nov 22, 2010 10:31:51 GMT -5
Uhhhhh. No, I don't. But I don't know what that has to do with the price of tea in China. Every bit of circumstantial evidence I've ever seen suggests that Lance doped. Virtually every top contender who raced against him has been caught. Virtually every member of his teams have been caught, admitted to doping, or been implicated in a doping scandal. Is it possible that Lance didn't dope? I guess. But it's also possible that I'll make a million dollars next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by YellowLemondTed on Nov 22, 2010 15:53:34 GMT -5
Where are the conspiracy theories about why there hasn't been any hard evidence against him if there's as much circumstantial evidence? I was watching sport center this morning, and as soon as they started talking about Johnson's 5 championships, my mind went right to this. I was feeling a bit witty. Please ignore the never ending Lance debate, just felt like the board needed some life.
|
|
|
|
Post by mvi on Nov 22, 2010 20:24:39 GMT -5
I'm afraid this will turn very ugly.
Very bad for cycling.
I want to believe Lance , but indeed, if you destroy the known dopers you are suspect.
|
|
